Oh, Hello

Of Cameras

“Hello photographer, the report of my death was an exaggeration.

Yours,
Camera”

The latest ad from Apple about the usefulness of their iPads got me thinking, for whatever reason, about cameras, photography, and articles that pop up from time to time to declare ambitious statements about photography.

Another has popped up recently as I’m sure many of you reading have already come across, where another journalist decided to declare the end of the camera as we know it. However, until I see a mobile camera share the same level of technical precision with which one is able to capture the same emotional depth and clarity of their more sophisticated brothers, I am not buying into these baitish articles about how traditional photography is dead. Traditional meaning, in this case, using a device designed only to make photographs, not share them.

Is photography evolving? Sure. Is it becoming more accessible to anyone? In a way, of course, software is able to gloss over most any cameras shortcomings these days to some degree. But to declare it’s figurehead, the stand-alone camera, dead or even starting to die is a gross over-exaggeration. To me, these sentiments always come across as oversimplified, wishful attempts at making a statement about the field in general. It’s like stories I read last year about still photography becoming irrelevant in the face of such capable video camera stills, really?

In the early days of commercially available cameras there was not a lot to distinguish those created for the general public versus the professional. A camera was a camera, and advancements were made as a whole so big steps such as the introduction of 35mm film and smaller, easier to carry cameras were obviously created to spread the technology to a wider audience by making the process more convenient.

As time went on a dividing line started to appear between cameras made for consumers versus those designed for professionals. Cameras such as the first Olympus Pen series cameras in the 60s or later the Minox 35 EL in the mid 70’s paved the way for the modern consumer friendly point and shoot which slowly but surely became more and more capable until the boom of digital swept us all off our feet.

The race for the smallest or most capable and/or convenient camera is nothing new, it’s history repeating itself and all the hyperbole about how no one will need or want any cameras other than their mobile phones? It’s nonsense.

In many ways, the landscape today is no different than it was in 1975, only the technology has changed. There will always be the simple, snapshot cameras that anyone can pick up and use and there will always be surprisingly great photos that come out of those simplified little cameras. Nothing has changed here, it’s just that the act of sharing the photos has changed and of course that is no small matter.

It’s not the personal satisfaction of making photographs and sharing them with others that is changing, it’s the expectation of the end viewer that is constantly shifting as the act of sharing grows exponentially. The easier it becomes, the more people we find interacting with the medium, and with mass adoption we see a lower point of entry in general and thus connoisseurs of the craft are born of a different mindset and existing hobbyists attempt to fold into a new way of approaching their favorite hobby or profession in fear of being left behind.

Photography will continue to be a popular and increasingly simple way to communicate and tiny digital cameras attached to our smartphones will surely continue to grow as the dominant source of output but I have this funny feeling that I’m not the only one out there who isn’t ready to toss their cameras into a shoebox in the back of their closet.

There is nothing uncomfortable or strange about getting back from a vacation and realizing your iPhone photos are looking good enough for your needs. You’re still taking the same photos, just with a smaller camera and in the process realizing your style and photographic voice doesn’t require any gear beyond a point and shoot. There is nothing wrong with that, obviously. But it is no reason to get on a soap box and claim the camera is dying. The truth is far from this claim. It is simply evolving, as it always has, and the ebb and flow of those who want creative control in camera vs those who get enough creative inspiration from adding software filters will continue to fluctuate in time.

Personally speaking, using a camera is not simply a means to reach an end for me. Just because it would be easier for me to shoot using my iPhone’s camera doesn’t mean that I should. Photography is a force larger than one style and one lens can be held responsible for and all the software tricks in the world could not mimic the emotional fulfillment and gratitude I have for photography in a traditional sense. The future may lay with a digital dominance and that is perfectly fine, but the tools used to capture light in a creative way by passionate photographers can not all boil down into one automated click of the button.

That said, this is by no means a dismissal of mobile photography or the direction it is continuing to take photography in general. I myself love shooting around with my iPhone as much as the next guy and support the technology that it propagates.  The future of photography is great, I’m positive of that and no matter what you choose to believe I can’t in good conscience stand by and let a fellow wandering photographer looking to plant flags in modern trends try to sell you snake oil. Not when it’s a subject I am so passionate about. Even with a passionate mind one can still manage to lose sight of the sun.

Hello camera, you’re looking good for your age! Still as capable and challenging as you ever were. Let’s go see what light we can find today.

Best,
John

Comments

  1. Of Cameras: 'Traditional Photography' is Most Certainly Not Dead - January 14, 2014 at 2:21 pm

    […] About the author: John Carey is a photographer, writer and curator based out of North Carolina. He runs the website Fifty Foot Shadows where he shares an ample supply of photographic desktop wallpapers, reviews, articles on photography and technology, music suggestions and the stories behind the photographs featured on the site. You can follow him on Twitter, Instagram and Flickr. This article originally appeared here […]

  2. Tom Martin - January 14, 2014 at 6:41 pm

    John,
    I just read this article on PetaPixel, who directed me to your site. I appreciate your sentiment and am in gleeful agreement with you on all counts. In my modest camera inventory is an Android phone, a Sony NEX3n, and I recently replaced my Nikon D7000 with a newly acquired Nikon Df (which surely classifies me.) But I use all three regularly, for different situations, and with varied intent.
    The real reason for my taking time to respond, however, is to express my appreciation of the B&W that accompanies this article. Subject and composition is inspiring, but maybe moreso is the perfect range of whites (as on her jacket) to black and the clear crisp mid-tones with clear, soft detail in her hair. Nicely done.
    Best regards,
    Tom Martin
    Rock Hill, SC

  3. Tom Martin - January 14, 2014 at 6:48 pm

    John,
    In my camera inventory, I forgot to add that I still have and continue to collect various 35mm and medium format film cameras that I do still use, just for the pleasure of it.
    Once again, best regards,
    Tom Martin
    Rock Hill, SC

  4. Matthew Rakola - January 15, 2014 at 11:15 am

    What I find more interesting is the fact that there is going to be a whole generation of photos that are taken with basically the same lens- the 35mm equivalent of roughly 33mm. If a photographer really wants their work to stand out in this day and age (god that makes me sound old) forget about the medium it was captured on, shoot telephoto! Try spending the whole day documenting your life with a (35mm equiv.) 135mm lens. That’s what’s going to push you creatively, not shooting a wide angle on a film camera or applying filters.

    my two pennies,
    matthew rakola

  5. john - January 15, 2014 at 11:23 am

    Thanks so much for stopping by to tell me that Tom, always encouraging to hear such praise. I love shooting film as well, still something satisfying about it that I can’t reproduce wile holding a digital camera.

    Matthew, I could see that, I often push beginner photographers asking me questions about getting started to use prime lenses but had never considered pushing toward a telephoto specifically, that would be a challenge to think creatively with such a small piece of whats around you.

  6. Marijn - January 15, 2014 at 12:47 pm

    Great piece. Snapping pictures isn’t the same as photography. My 5S is the best on-the-go camera I’ve ever used, but when it comes to portraits or low light (concert) photos, nothing beats my prehistoric EOS 350D with ultracheap 50mm f1.8…

  7. Of Cameras | Closed Book - January 17, 2014 at 8:23 am

    […] Full article via Of Cameras. […]

  8. Alamda - February 18, 2014 at 8:04 pm

    Of course that Apple was refering to the “hand-casual” digital cameras, not PROFESSIONAL PHOTOGRAPHY -of COURSE NOT.

  9. john - February 18, 2014 at 9:51 pm

    Yes, of course, this is obvious. I know this, as do most. I said nothing to the contrary. This was written with a few specific people in mind who are starting to dismiss the idea of cameras which give you full manual control and higher capability (“professional cameras”). Many other photographers know this and see it happening as well.

    Casual, point and shoot cameras have been in production for decades and mobile photography falls into this category, yet, I continue to see some photographers claiming the death of the camera in its classic sense yet there are countless reasons this isn’t fully true. I wrote this more as an ode to the idea of a camera in its classic sense, not to ruffle any feathers and certainly not try to pit an iPhone against a DSLR. Of course that is crazy talk, OF COURSE.

Leave A Reply

To whom it may concern,

IMAGES FOUND WITHIN THE FIFTYFOOTSHADOWS.NET PARALLAX WALLPAPER PACK ARE ©JOHN CAREY AND MAY NOT BE USED FOR ANY COMMERCIAL USE WITHOUT PERMISSION. 

DO:

• Enjoy the images! It’s a labor of love, thanks for your support!
• Share fiftyfootshadows.net with friends.
• Send me a quick mail if you are interested in using an image for commercial or personal use other than wallpaper.

DON’T:

• Post these elsewhere online.
• Share links directly to images.
• Pass them around in mass.
• Make prints.
• Use images for web banners or graphics.
• Use them in commercial work.

If you help me out with these I will be able to keep doing what I love to do. Thanks again, really, for your support and understanding. -J

——

By downloading any content from fiftyfootshadows.net you agree to the following terms:

All of the images contained within this website, fiftyfootshadows.net, are property of, John Carey unless otherwise posted. The images are distributed as freeware but they are available for personal use only on your personal computer, tablet, or smartphone as your wallpaper image. Any use of these images for any purpose other than this is a violation of these terms and anyone found using said images will be asked to either compensate the creator for doing so or be asked to stop using them immediately.

I ask that you refrain from using any images found on fiftyfootshadows.net to create physically printed material of any kind. This includes posters, photographic prints, fliers, etc. Under no circumstances may you make a physical reproduction without written permission.

These rules also apply for any artwork or imagery submitted and shown within this site which was created by an artist aside from myself. Any images submitted and shared as wallpapers are the property of the artist who created them and in the same manner as my images, you are asked to receive permission before using them in any way aside from their intended use. Any use of these images outside of for your own personal use as a desktop wallpaper image is prohibited without permission from the author of the image. Commercial licensing is available upon request. Please write with any inquiries.

When sharing images via your personal blogs I kindly ask that you link back directly to either the post the image was taken from or the base of the website at www.fiftyfootshadows.net and give a credit to www.fiftyfootshadows.net. Do not re-post full resolution desktop images anywhere without permission. If you would like to use an image for your blog background or something of the sort simply write to ask first. Support the artwork you admire! Also, it is greatly appreciated if you do NOT link directly to the zip files. This is more or less the same as re-posting them as it circumvents the tiny bit of support I ask of you which is to simply link back to the original post for others to enjoy the site.

It’s not fair to artists if you do not credit their work and link back to the original content creator. It is theft plain and simple and blogs that attempt to somehow be mysterious by not giving credit to the creators are simply hurting the artistic community as a whole. If you love it so much then please, support it! The artistic community on the Internet is based on trust. Without trust then what do we have? are you going to be one of the responsible users out there or will you be among the bottom feeders, stealing content and passing it off as your own to make a quick buck in ad sales.

Use your best judgement and we will get along just fine.

Thank you for your understanding and support!

-John Carey (curator, owner)

fiftyfootshadows.net

fiftyfootshadows@gmail.com